← All posts
May 9, 202613 min readAudit frameworkMethodologyScoring

The six dimensions we score in every Aspireco audit.

Every Aspireco audit scores six dimensions on a 10-point scale. Below is what each one measures, the cohort average we see across 200+ small-business audits, and the single highest-leverage fix we typically recommend in each.

When we audit a small-business website, the temptation is to give the owner a long, undifferentiated checklist of issues. That is what most agency reports look like. It is also what makes them useless — the owner reads the list, feels overwhelmed, and does nothing.

Our framework collapses everything that matters into six dimensions, each scored 0-10. The total is out of 60. We have run this framework on 200+ small-business audits since 2023, and the cohort distribution is stable enough that we can tell you what the average dental clinic, restaurant, contractor, or salon scores. More usefully: we can tell you which dimension to fix first regardless of vertical.

Dimension 1: First impression

What a customer sees and feels in the first 5 seconds of landing on your homepage. We score: hero photo authenticity (real vs. stock), headline outcome-orientation, presence of pricing or starting points, and the clarity of what you actually do. The cohort average is 5.2/10. The top 10% score 8+ and they all share the same trait: their hero shows real photos of their actual team or work, not stock imagery.

The single highest-leverage first-impression fix we recommend is replacing stock hero photos with a 30-minute photo shoot of the actual team and space. It costs almost nothing and converts measurably better in nearly every vertical we audit. The exception is e-commerce where product imagery dominates — but even then, an "about" page with real founders performs better than one without.

Dimension 2: Mobile experience

A composite of Google PSI mobile scores plus our own checks: tap-target size, phone-number tel: links, booking-flow integrity on iOS Safari (a common point of failure), Largest Contentful Paint under 2.5 seconds, and image optimization. Cohort average: 4.8/10 — significantly weaker than first-impression because most owners are designing on desktop.

The most common single fix: convert the hero image to WebP/AVIF and serve responsive sizes via the picture element. A typical 1.2 MB hero image becomes 140 KB without visual loss, and LCP drops from 4 seconds to under 2 seconds. Google rewards this in Core Web Vitals scoring, and customers see your page render before they bounce.

Dimension 3: Search visibility (SEO)

How discoverable you are in the searches that matter. We score: Google Business Profile completeness across the nine high-impact attributes, schema markup presence and correctness, dedicated landing pages for top-revenue services, citation consistency across local directories, and rank position for the primary commercial-intent keyword in your geography. Cohort average: 5.6/10.

The highest-leverage SEO fix is almost always GBP completeness. The nine attributes — appointment URL, online care, accessibility, languages spoken, payments, parking, service areas, holiday hours, primary category — are visible to Google but invisible to most owners (buried in the management interface). Filling them takes 30 minutes and typically lifts local-pack appearances 18-30% within 30-60 days.

Dimension 4: Calls to action (CTA)

How clearly the site moves a visitor toward the action that matters. We score: dominant CTA visibility, CTA copy specificity (generic vs. outcome-led), competing CTA clarity (Hick's Law applies — three equally-weighted CTAs suppress action), the actual booking flow ergonomics, and "what happens next" copy reassurance after the action. Cohort average: 4.4/10 — the weakest of the six dimensions on average.

Most small-business sites have three or four equal-weight CTAs ("Book", "Call", "Contact us", "Learn more") and they compete with each other. The fix is to pick the highest-intent action, make it visually dominant, and demote the rest to secondary text links. For a dental clinic, that primary CTA is "Book your cleaning" — recurring revenue, highest intent. For a contractor, it is "Get a free quote." For a restaurant, it is "Reserve a table." One CTA dominant, the rest demoted.

Dimension 5: Trust + reviews

How credible you read on first contact. We score: review surfacing (star rating visible above the fold, recent reviews on the homepage), professional credentials shown where applicable, real photos of the team and the space, registered corporate identity in the footer (corporation number, real address, real contact info), and trust-friendly copy for buyer demographics that need it ("Anxiety-friendly," "Same-day appointments," "Insurance accepted"). Cohort average: 5.9/10.

The single highest-leverage trust fix is surfacing your existing Google reviews on your homepage. Most customers comparing three local businesses open all three sites in tabs — they do not cross-check Google. If you have a 4.7-star average across 312 reviews and your site shows zero of those reviews, you are throwing free trust away. A simple auto-rotating review strip with a "view all 312 →" link is one of the highest-converting additions we make.

Dimension 6: Booking + intake

The full path from interested visitor to confirmed booking. We score: form length (fewer is better — eight fields is the sweet spot for service businesses), payment / deposit handling, automated reminders, no-show prevention, new-vs-returning customer flow split, and post-booking confirmation copy. Cohort average: 4.1/10 — usually the weakest dimension and almost always where the most untapped revenue lives.

The most common single fix: cut your intake form. We see 17-22 field forms regularly. Industry benchmarks for service-business booking are 6-10 fields, completed in roughly 90 seconds. Every additional field after 8 drops completion by ~7%. Move the medical history, insurance details, treatment history to a post-booking flow that the customer fills in before their visit instead. Customers complete short forms; long ones get abandoned half-finished.

How the six combine

Total scores cluster in our cohort like this:

  • 0-20 / 60 — fundamentals broken; engagement starts with foundations.
  • 21-35 / 60 — typical small business; clear opportunity for 30-50% lift in 90 days.
  • 36-45 / 60 — solid foundation; lift comes from depth (new service pages, ad campaigns, content).
  • 46-60 / 60 — rare; usually means well-built but undermarketed; growth comes from new channels.

The score on its own is not the point. What matters is which dimension is dragging the average down — that is where the highest-leverage 30-day work is. We sequence engagements that way: lowest-scoring dimension first, then the next, then the next. By month four, scores in the 45-55 range are typical for our active customers.

The lite audit on the homepage gives you a 15-second snapshot across the six dimensions using live Google PageSpeed Insights and our heuristics. The full dossier — same framework, deeper analysis, named fixes — ships in 24 hours with no obligation. From there, tier recommendations flow directly from where the dimensions are weakest.

Want this analysis on your business?

Drop a URL on the homepage. The same six-dimension framework runs against your site in 15 seconds.

Run the audit →